<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still Lenses That Can Grace The Big Screen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bragi Schut</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-25555</link>
		<dc:creator>Bragi Schut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-25555</guid>
		<description>Hi.  Thanks for all the great info, Shane.  I&#039;ve been lurking for awhile and reading your blogs.  I&#039;n not a cinematographer, I&#039;m a writer and filmmaker and am looking to build up a low budget DSLR kit.  From my research it sounds like the Nikon lenses are the most cost effective choice, and you seem pleased with the quality (compared to the canon L series)...but I have to admit I&#039;m having some trouble finding the older &quot;a&quot; lenses you mention on ebay.  A All the lenses I have found are either AF or AI (which you cautioned against, due to their smaller barrel size and the difficulty of attaching focus pullers to them).  Can you give me any more information on the name of the series of lenses you discussed in your nikon lens review?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  Thanks for all the great info, Shane.  I&#8217;ve been lurking for awhile and reading your blogs.  I&#8217;n not a cinematographer, I&#8217;m a writer and filmmaker and am looking to build up a low budget DSLR kit.  From my research it sounds like the Nikon lenses are the most cost effective choice, and you seem pleased with the quality (compared to the canon L series)&#8230;but I have to admit I&#8217;m having some trouble finding the older &#8220;a&#8221; lenses you mention on ebay.  A All the lenses I have found are either AF or AI (which you cautioned against, due to their smaller barrel size and the difficulty of attaching focus pullers to them).  Can you give me any more information on the name of the series of lenses you discussed in your nikon lens review?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Greenhaw</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-20643</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Greenhaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-20643</guid>
		<description>Its not always about sharpness its about the overall look of the image. The zebra lenses produce a look that is very pleasing and filmic. I have a set of the Leica r&#039;s 35/2 50/2 90/2.8 100/2.8 app but love the look of the zebra 180mm  (field of view of a 270mm) and 80mm (field of view of a 120mm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not always about sharpness its about the overall look of the image. The zebra lenses produce a look that is very pleasing and filmic. I have a set of the Leica r&#8217;s 35/2 50/2 90/2.8 100/2.8 app but love the look of the zebra 180mm  (field of view of a 270mm) and 80mm (field of view of a 120mm).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canon eos review</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-18935</link>
		<dc:creator>canon eos review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-18935</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;canon eos review...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Still Lenses That Can Grace The Big Screen &#124; Hurlbut Visuals[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>canon eos review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Still Lenses That Can Grace The Big Screen | Hurlbut Visuals[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-18395</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-18395</guid>
		<description>keh, That adapter doesn&#039;t work very well with M mount Leica&#039;s.  The Zeiss ZE are a good choice or old Nikon AI and AIS with a fotodiox adapter.  For sports the Canon L series 70-200mm IS is an excellent lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keh, That adapter doesn&#8217;t work very well with M mount Leica&#8217;s.  The Zeiss ZE are a good choice or old Nikon AI and AIS with a fotodiox adapter.  For sports the Canon L series 70-200mm IS is an excellent lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keh</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-18136</link>
		<dc:creator>keh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-18136</guid>
		<description>hi shane
just got a 7D this weekend for a video shoot i need to do of the northern lights next month. i&#039;ve got a 17-40L lens but although it&#039;s nice and wide it&#039;s way toooo slow for video on the 7D. I have a bunch of Leica M lenses from my M9 and am thinking of getting one of those adapters on ebay for the 7D. Not sure how well that will work... and if it&#039;s no good I&#039;m thinking about either getting a 28mm F2 ZE lens (and a 50mm ZE later to match it) or a 24mm 1.4L now (and a 50mm 1.2 later). The 7D will primarily be for video and when a Leica M just won&#039;t do (events, sports or autofocus, zoom stuff which a rangefinder just doesn&#039;t do). What would you do in my position? 
thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi shane<br />
just got a 7D this weekend for a video shoot i need to do of the northern lights next month. i&#8217;ve got a 17-40L lens but although it&#8217;s nice and wide it&#8217;s way toooo slow for video on the 7D. I have a bunch of Leica M lenses from my M9 and am thinking of getting one of those adapters on ebay for the 7D. Not sure how well that will work&#8230; and if it&#8217;s no good I&#8217;m thinking about either getting a 28mm F2 ZE lens (and a 50mm ZE later to match it) or a 24mm 1.4L now (and a 50mm 1.2 later). The 7D will primarily be for video and when a Leica M just won&#8217;t do (events, sports or autofocus, zoom stuff which a rangefinder just doesn&#8217;t do). What would you do in my position?<br />
thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-17995</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-17995</guid>
		<description>Hey Shane, I&#039;ve been seeing a few people using the older Zeiss contax primes. The quality seems really good and they are a bit cheaper in price than the Leica lenses. What are your thoughts on the look and quality of the contax primes, do you think they are any good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Shane, I&#8217;ve been seeing a few people using the older Zeiss contax primes. The quality seems really good and they are a bit cheaper in price than the Leica lenses. What are your thoughts on the look and quality of the contax primes, do you think they are any good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel W</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-17494</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-17494</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a opinion on using Rokkor lenses? I know some of them supposedly share very similar optical formulas with Leica lenses from the same era. Since Minolta and Leica worked together to codevelop certain cameras and lenses. I have a way of mounting the Rokkors onto my T3i with no/slight modifications, or loss of infinity focus. No use of a glass adapter either. I have a modified Rokkor MC 58mm 1.4  that I shoot with regularly and prefer it over the Zeiss EF 50mm 1.4 . The first camera I learned to shoot on was a Minolta SRT101 w/ a Rokkor-X MC 50mm 1.4 and would love to know how these lenses generally hold up on the big screen. Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

-Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a opinion on using Rokkor lenses? I know some of them supposedly share very similar optical formulas with Leica lenses from the same era. Since Minolta and Leica worked together to codevelop certain cameras and lenses. I have a way of mounting the Rokkors onto my T3i with no/slight modifications, or loss of infinity focus. No use of a glass adapter either. I have a modified Rokkor MC 58mm 1.4  that I shoot with regularly and prefer it over the Zeiss EF 50mm 1.4 . The first camera I learned to shoot on was a Minolta SRT101 w/ a Rokkor-X MC 50mm 1.4 and would love to know how these lenses generally hold up on the big screen. Any help would be greatly appreciated. </p>
<p>-Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-17486</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-17486</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much,I am very impressed not only by your professionalism but how you take the time to answer your followers/fans questions.The knowledge you provide is priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much,I am very impressed not only by your professionalism but how you take the time to answer your followers/fans questions.The knowledge you provide is priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Adelsman</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-17471</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Adelsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-17471</guid>
		<description>Hey Shane,
Thanks for all you do! I have a question: I was recently shooting with a Pentax K-X (I know, not the greatest camera, but I got a great deal on it and learned a lot from it) and bought a bunch of old Pentax glass. I just bought a Sony Nex 5n, which I am loving, and got a Fotodiox adapter for the Pentax glass. my question is: what do you think of old Pentax lenses? Do they hold up to the Nikon AI lenses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Shane,<br />
Thanks for all you do! I have a question: I was recently shooting with a Pentax K-X (I know, not the greatest camera, but I got a great deal on it and learned a lot from it) and bought a bunch of old Pentax glass. I just bought a Sony Nex 5n, which I am loving, and got a Fotodiox adapter for the Pentax glass. my question is: what do you think of old Pentax lenses? Do they hold up to the Nikon AI lenses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/06/still-lenses/comment-page-3/#comment-17449</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/?p=805#comment-17449</guid>
		<description>Andrew, Thank you so much for the kind words.  I would go with a 24mm Leica, 25mm Zeiss ZE, 24mm Canon L series</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, Thank you so much for the kind words.  I would go with a 24mm Leica, 25mm Zeiss ZE, 24mm Canon L series</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

